← Back to Blog
Trucking News

Trucking News: May 7, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

Trucking News: May 7, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

Diesel Costs Surge Impacting Trucking and Goods Prices

The rising cost of diesel is making a significant dent in the wallets of truckers and pushing the prices of consumer goods upward. As a central player in the economy, the trucking industry is being squeezed by these increases, directly translating to higher costs for goods across Minnesota and beyond. The combination of geopolitical stressors, including the ongoing conflict in Iran, has disrupted global fuel supplies, making diesel markedly more expensive.

The ripple effect of these rising costs is particularly pronounced for small carriers and owner-operators who often operate on tight margins. Higher fuel expenses mean these businesses need to recalibrate their operations and pricing structures. While larger fleets can negotiate fuel contracts or employ advanced logistics technology to mitigate the impact, smaller operations may find themselves absorbing these costs more directly. VAU0 LLC provides tools like our transportation management system (TMS) to help manage logistical challenges and optimize routes, potentially offsetting some of these fuel cost hikes.

“As diesel prices climb, we expect a cascade of increased logistics costs flowing through supply chains, ultimately affecting everything from grocery to manufacturing goods.”

Minnesota Trucking Feeling the Heat from Iranian Conflict

Minnesota’s trucking companies are particularly feeling the pain from the spike in diesel prices. The conflict in Iran has disrupted supply chains, leading to heightened competition for already scarce diesel resources. This geopolitical tension adds another layer of complexity to the operational challenges faced by truckers in the region.

For Minnesota-based small carriers and independent drivers, this situation intensifies the need for strategic adjustments. Simply put, these operators are exploring new avenues to reduce fuel consumption, such as vehicle maintenance, optimizing delivery routes, and adopting efficient driving practices. Staying informed on these strategies can significantly impact the bottom line in these tumultuous times.

XPO CEO to Explore Technology’s Role in Freight at Upcoming Talk

XPO, Inc.’s CEO is set to discuss at an upcoming event the importance of technological advancement and cultural adaptation within the freight industry. As companies strive to stay competitive, the integration of technology remains crucial. This dialogue will likely cover how technology like artificial intelligence and automation can enhance operational efficiency and reduce costs.

For smaller carriers and owner-operators, technology holds transformative potential. The initial investment in digital tools might seem daunting, but solutions like the TMS offered by VAU0 LLC provide scalable, cost-effective options that can help streamline operations and bolster competitive standing. Staying attuned to these developments is crucial for those looking to maintain or grow their market share in a rapidly evolving industry.

FMCSA Non-Domiciled CDL Ban and Its Implications

The FMCSA's recent ruling to uphold the non-domiciled CDL ban marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing legal battles concerning non-citizen drivers. This decision has sparked considerable debate within the trucking community, especially among those relying on a diverse workforce to meet delivery demands.

For smaller fleets, this decision underscores the necessity of ensuring compliance with federal regulations. It’s essential to proactively manage their driver qualification files and immigration documentation. Engines like the one provided on our compliance resources page can assist companies in navigating these regulatory landscapes.

Guidance on Safety and Pressure to Violate Compliance

The FMCSA has issued new guidance to assist truck drivers who feel pressured to violate safety regulations. This new framework provides critical resources for drivers to navigate employer demands without sacrificing regulatory compliance or safety. It’s a timely reminder of the importance of upholding safety standards across the board.

For owner-operators and small fleet managers, this guidance is a call to reinforce a culture of safety within their operations. The FMCSA's resources equip drivers with the knowledge needed to stand firm against unsafe practices. Ensuring that your team understands these guidelines protects your business and its bottom line while prioritizing safety.

What Carriers Should Do This Week

  • Review Fuel Efficiency Strategies: Reassess routes and driving practices to minimize fuel usage and evaluate maintenance schedules for efficiency improvements.
  • Stay Informed on Regulatory Changes: Regularly check updates from the FMCSA and verify that driver qualifications align with the latest regulations.
  • Invest in Technology: Consider adopting a TMS or other tech solutions to improve logistical efficiencies and reduce operational costs.
  • Emphasize Safety Compliance: Educate your team on FMCSA's safety guidelines and reinforce the importance of complying with all safety regulations.
  • Financial Planning: Adjust budgeting to account for increased fuel costs and explore financial assistance programs if needed.
← Back to Blog For Carriers →
Why We Built VAU0 Instead of Buying Another TMS | VAU0 Blog
Our Story

Why we built VAU0 instead of buying another TMS

In 2022, we were running a small fleet and spending approximately $400 per truck per month on software. TMS license, ELD subscription, e-sign service, separate accounting integration. Four different logins. Four different monthly invoices. Four different support teams to call when something didn't work.

None of it talked to each other without manual data entry.

The software evaluation that changed everything

We spent three months evaluating every major TMS and fleet management system on the market. AscendTMS, McLeod, Motive, EZLogz, KeepTruckin, TruckingOffice, Axon. We signed up for demos, trials, and in two cases, paid for actual subscriptions to test them properly.

What we found was consistent across almost all of them: the software was built by people who had never dispatched a truck. You could tell immediately. The terminology was slightly wrong. The workflows assumed steps that no real dispatcher would take. The ELD and TMS were always separate systems that "integrated" — meaning they sometimes shared data, if you configured things correctly, and the configuration broke whenever either vendor pushed an update.

"The best way to evaluate trucking software is to use it under real pressure. Not in a demo. Not in a test environment. On a real load, with a real deadline, when a broker is calling every 30 minutes for an update."

The specific things that were broken

Without naming specific vendors: one major TMS required five screen transitions to update a load status. Not five clicks — five full page navigations. On a mobile browser from a truck stop, that meant 45 seconds to tell a broker the truck was loaded. Another system had beautiful analytics dashboards but couldn't tell you, in real time, how many hours of drive time your driver had remaining without navigating to a separate compliance module.

The ELD market was worse. Most ELD systems were designed to satisfy FMCSA's technical requirements — which they did — while making the user experience as painful as possible. Drivers hated them. When drivers hate their tools, they find workarounds. Workarounds create compliance risk.

The moment we decided to build

The decision was made on a Tuesday afternoon when our dispatcher spent 40 minutes re-entering data from a rate confirmation PDF that our ELD had already captured in a different system. The information existed. It was digital. It lived in three different places that didn't talk to each other, and a human was manually transferring it between systems.

That's not a technology problem. That's a lack of ambition problem. Nobody had decided to solve it because the existing systems were profitable enough without solving it.

What we decided to build instead

One platform. ELD and TMS as the same system, not integrations. AI that reads rate confirmation PDFs so dispatchers don't have to. A dispatcher — eventually an AI dispatcher — that covers nights and weekends so loads don't get missed. E-sign built in, not bolted on.

And priced at zero through 2026, because the goal was to prove the product worked before asking carriers to pay for it.

Two years in: did it work?

The Rate Con AI has a 95%+ accuracy rate on standard broker formats. ERETH ELD passed FMCSA's technical certification. Our AI dispatchers book real loads for real carriers after hours. The carrier dashboard still occasionally has a minor bug — we fix them the same day they're reported.

Would we have been better off just using an existing system and focusing on freight? Financially, in the short term, probably yes. But we would have kept paying $400 per truck per month for software that we knew was mediocre. And we would have missed the opportunity to build something that actually works the way the industry needs it to work.

We don't regret it.

← Back to Blog Next: Our first AI broker call →