← Back to Blog
Trucking News

Trucking News: June 12, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

Trucking News: June 12, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know
```html

Four Days in October to Move Trucking Forward Together

The American Trucking Associations (ATA) is gearing up for its much-anticipated "Four Days in October" event, a summit designed to bring together industry leaders and stakeholders to tackle pressing issues in trucking. This year, the focus will be on technological advancements, sustainability, and the evolving regulatory landscape. The event promises to be a breeding ground for new ideas aimed at propelling the industry forward.

For owner-operators and small carriers, this event represents a golden opportunity to network and gain insights into future trends that might affect their operations. It's also a chance to voice concerns directly to industry leaders and policymakers. Getting involved in such events can help small players anticipate changes and pivot their businesses accordingly.

Trucking Industry Adapts to Volatility; Parade of Homes Showcases New Construction

The trucking industry continues to navigate through volatile economic conditions, yet one bright spot appears to be the ongoing infrastructure development showcased by events like the Parade of Homes. New construction projects not only indicate a rebound in certain sectors but also signal potential increases in freight demand as materials and goods require transportation.

For smaller carriers, staying attuned to local and national construction trends can be beneficial. Increased construction means higher demand for hauling building materials and equipment. Carriers can leverage this boom by optimizing routes and load management to capitalize on these new opportunities. VAU0's TMS solution can assist in planning and managing these dynamic loads efficiently, ensuring maximum profitability.

Beyond the Central Transport Settlement: Lessons on Hiring and Risk

The recent Central Transport settlement has put a spotlight on the importance of robust hiring practices and risk management in trucking. The settlement underlines how crucial it is for carriers to diligently vet their hires to avoid legal pitfalls that could impact their operations financially.

Smaller carriers and owner-operators must ensure they have thorough hiring protocols. Implementing rigorous background checks and training programs can mitigate risks associated with non-compliance and negligence claims. Regular training sessions on compliance and safety are not just beneficial but essential in maintaining a sustainable business model.

FMCSA Teases Flurry of Rules for 2026

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) is set to roll out a suite of new rules by the end of 2026, hinting at significant changes on the horizon for the trucking industry. These regulations are expected to cover areas from driver safety to environmental standards, potentially impacting all carriers.

Carriers, especially smaller ones, should start preparing for these changes now. Staying ahead of regulatory shifts is critical, and leveraging VAU0's compliance resources can help carriers navigate these complexities with ease. Being proactive about compliance aids in avoiding penalties and ensuring smoother operations.

ACT Research: FMCSA Rules Tighten Capacity; Truckload Spot Rates Rise 30%

According to the latest findings from ACT Research, FMCSA's impending rules are likely tightening available capacity in the market, resulting in a substantial 30% increase in truckload spot rates. This market response presents both challenges and opportunities.

For smaller carriers, the spike in spot rates could mean greater revenue potential in the short term. However, adapting to tighter regulations will require strategic planning and possibly fleet adjustments to maintain efficiency and compliance. Utilizing technology to streamline operations, like VAU0's TMS, can help carriers manage loads effectively during these shifts.

"With FMCSA's new rules on the horizon, carriers must brace for increased compliance demands, but the silver lining is the potential rise in revenue due to spiking spot rates," noted industry expert Jeffrey MacDonald.

What Carriers Should Do This Week

  • Explore participation in industry events like the "Four Days in October" for strategic insights.
  • Monitor local construction projects to capitalize on freight opportunities.
  • Review and strengthen hiring practices to mitigate compliance risks.
  • Begin preparing for new FMCSA regulations with a focus on compliance resources.
  • Leverage technology, such as VAU0's TMS, to adapt to market changes effectively.
```
← Back to Blog For Carriers →
Why We Built ESSE Instead of Buying Another TMS | ESSE Blog
Our Story

Why we built ESSE instead of buying another TMS

In 2022, we were running a small fleet and spending approximately $400 per truck per month on software. TMS license, ELD subscription, e-sign service, separate accounting integration. Four different logins. Four different monthly invoices. Four different support teams to call when something didn't work.

None of it talked to each other without manual data entry.

The software evaluation that changed everything

We spent three months evaluating every major TMS and fleet management system on the market. AscendTMS, McLeod, Motive, EZLogz, KeepTruckin, TruckingOffice, Axon. We signed up for demos, trials, and in two cases, paid for actual subscriptions to test them properly.

What we found was consistent across almost all of them: the software was built by people who had never dispatched a truck. You could tell immediately. The terminology was slightly wrong. The workflows assumed steps that no real dispatcher would take. The ELD and TMS were always separate systems that "integrated" — meaning they sometimes shared data, if you configured things correctly, and the configuration broke whenever either vendor pushed an update.

"The best way to evaluate trucking software is to use it under real pressure. Not in a demo. Not in a test environment. On a real load, with a real deadline, when a broker is calling every 30 minutes for an update."

The specific things that were broken

Without naming specific vendors: one major TMS required five screen transitions to update a load status. Not five clicks — five full page navigations. On a mobile browser from a truck stop, that meant 45 seconds to tell a broker the truck was loaded. Another system had beautiful analytics dashboards but couldn't tell you, in real time, how many hours of drive time your driver had remaining without navigating to a separate compliance module.

The ELD market was worse. Most ELD systems were designed to satisfy FMCSA's technical requirements — which they did — while making the user experience as painful as possible. Drivers hated them. When drivers hate their tools, they find workarounds. Workarounds create compliance risk.

The moment we decided to build

The decision was made on a Tuesday afternoon when our dispatcher spent 40 minutes re-entering data from a rate confirmation PDF that our ELD had already captured in a different system. The information existed. It was digital. It lived in three different places that didn't talk to each other, and a human was manually transferring it between systems.

That's not a technology problem. That's a lack of ambition problem. Nobody had decided to solve it because the existing systems were profitable enough without solving it.

What we decided to build instead

One platform. ELD and TMS as the same system, not integrations. AI that reads rate confirmation PDFs so dispatchers don't have to. A dispatcher — eventually an AI dispatcher — that covers nights and weekends so loads don't get missed. E-sign built in, not bolted on.

And priced at zero through 2026, because the goal was to prove the product worked before asking carriers to pay for it.

Two years in: did it work?

The Rate Con AI has a 95%+ accuracy rate on standard broker formats. ERETH ELD passed FMCSA's technical certification. Our AI dispatchers book real loads for real carriers after hours. The carrier dashboard still occasionally has a minor bug — we fix them the same day they're reported.

Would we have been better off just using an existing system and focusing on freight? Financially, in the short term, probably yes. But we would have kept paying $400 per truck per month for software that we knew was mediocre. And we would have missed the opportunity to build something that actually works the way the industry needs it to work.

We don't regret it.

← Back to Blog Next: Our first AI broker call →