← Back to Blog
Trucking News

Trucking News: September 13, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

Trucking News: September 13, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

September 13, 2026 — Today’s trucking news points to three issues carriers cannot ignore: fragile operating margins, a tightening driver pipeline, and compliance decisions that can affect a business before a truck ever leaves the yard. Here is what matters for drivers, owner-operators, and small fleets.

Sparhawk to close Wisconsin Rapids trucking business as layoffs begin

Sparhawk is reportedly closing its trucking operation in Wisconsin Rapids, with layoffs already underway. A shutdown like this is a reminder that even established regional businesses can become difficult to sustain when freight demand, labor costs, equipment expenses, insurance, and customer pricing move in the wrong direction at the same time.

For small carriers, the immediate lesson is to watch cash flow and customer concentration closely. A business that depends heavily on one shipper, one lane, or one type of freight can lose stability quickly when that work changes. Owners should review whether each lane is producing enough after fuel, driver pay, maintenance, tolls, insurance, and administrative costs. If the numbers do not work, adding trucks usually increases the exposure rather than solving the problem.

Drivers affected by the layoffs should move quickly on applications, benefits, licensing records, and employment documentation. Nearby carriers may have opportunities, but hiring decisions can move fast when experienced drivers become available. Owner-operators should also be cautious about taking on a new truck payment simply because a seat or contract becomes available.

Trucking industry prepares for National Truck Driver Appreciation Week

Trucking companies and industry groups are gearing up for National Truck Driver Appreciation Week. The annual observance gives carriers a chance to recognize the people who keep freight moving, but the most meaningful appreciation is not limited to food, banners, or social media posts.

Drivers generally notice practical improvements first: predictable home time, accurate pay, usable equipment, responsive dispatch, and respect for safe operating decisions. Small fleets can make a strong impression with a driver review process, a written plan for handling breakdowns, and quick correction of payroll or detention problems. Recognition is more credible when it is connected to better day-to-day operations.

Owner-operators and company drivers can also use the week to raise recurring issues constructively. Ask for clarity on detention documentation, communication expectations, maintenance scheduling, and how safety concerns are handled. For carriers, retention is usually less expensive than recruiting and training a replacement, so appreciation should be treated as an operating strategy, not just a public-relations exercise.

California officials and trucking leader criticize Homeland Security post targeting “Mr. Singh”

A Homeland Security post targeting “Mr. Singh” has drawn backlash from California officials and a trucking leader. The dispute highlights the tension between immigration enforcement messaging and the trucking industry’s dependence on a diverse workforce, including immigrant drivers, small-business owners, mechanics, and warehouse employees.

Carriers should avoid turning a politically charged post into assumptions about an individual’s legal status or compliance. Employers remain responsible for following employment-verification rules, maintaining required records, and treating workers consistently. Drivers should be wary of rumors spreading through social media, especially when a post does not provide enough verified information to establish what happened.

The practical takeaway for small fleets is to keep employment and safety documentation organized and use qualified professional guidance when an immigration or work-authorization issue arises. Do not ask dispatchers or supervisors to improvise legal advice. A written workplace policy, consistent recordkeeping, and respectful communication can reduce both compliance risk and unnecessary conflict.

DOT automated-vehicle strategy could shape trucking’s next phase

The Department of Transportation’s automated-vehicle strategy is drawing attention across trucking. Automated driving will not eliminate the need for today’s carriers overnight, but federal policy can influence testing, deployment, safety expectations, equipment design, and the pace at which autonomous technology reaches commercial lanes.

Small carriers should view this as a planning issue rather than an immediate replacement threat. The first effects may appear through limited pilot operations, automated yard movements, highway assist systems, or partnerships between large fleets and technology companies. Those changes could affect driver roles, insurance expectations, maintenance requirements, and the types of freight available to independent operators.

There may also be opportunities. Carriers with strong safety records, clean maintenance data, and reliable electronic records will be better positioned to work with technology providers or customers experimenting with automation. A practical starting point is improving data quality in the transportation management system. VAU0’s TMS tools can help carriers organize dispatch, load, and operational information so decisions are based on actual performance instead of guesswork.

FMCSA emergency CDL school closures put driver pipeline under pressure

FMCSA’s emergency closures of CDL schools, and the publication of every school listed, are among the most immediately actionable stories for drivers and carriers. When a training provider is closed or removed from the authorized pipeline, students can face uncertainty about their records, testing eligibility, and next steps. Carriers recruiting new drivers may also need to verify that training was completed through an acceptable provider.

For small carriers, the key point is simple: a driver’s training source is now a business risk to verify, not just a recruiting detail to assume.

Applicants should check the official closure information and preserve copies of enrollment documents, payment records, completion paperwork, and communications from the school. Do not assume that a certificate alone settles the issue. If a school’s status affects eligibility, the driver should obtain clarification from the appropriate state and federal authorities before paying another provider or scheduling a test.

Carriers should review how new-driver applications are screened. Confirm the training provider, check required licensing and qualification records, and keep a documented process for resolving questions. Recruiting pressure is not a reason to skip verification. A preventable onboarding error can create problems during an audit, inspection, insurance review, or customer qualification process. VAU0’s compliance resources can help carriers build a repeatable review process.

What carriers should do this week

  • Review every major lane and customer for true margin after fuel, maintenance, insurance, payroll, tolls, and administrative costs.
  • Use National Truck Driver Appreciation Week to address practical retention issues, including pay accuracy, home time, breakdown response, and communication.
  • Verify CDL training providers and preserve supporting records before onboarding new drivers.
  • Audit employment, qualification, and safety files; do not rely on informal explanations or social-media claims.
  • Improve dispatch and maintenance data so the fleet is ready for changing technology, customer requirements, and future automated-vehicle pilots.
← Back to Blog For Carriers →
Why We Built ESSE Instead of Buying Another TMS | ESSE Blog
Our Story

Why we built ESSE instead of buying another TMS

In 2022, we were running a small fleet and spending approximately $400 per truck per month on software. TMS license, ELD subscription, e-sign service, separate accounting integration. Four different logins. Four different monthly invoices. Four different support teams to call when something didn't work.

None of it talked to each other without manual data entry.

The software evaluation that changed everything

We spent three months evaluating every major TMS and fleet management system on the market. AscendTMS, McLeod, Motive, EZLogz, KeepTruckin, TruckingOffice, Axon. We signed up for demos, trials, and in two cases, paid for actual subscriptions to test them properly.

What we found was consistent across almost all of them: the software was built by people who had never dispatched a truck. You could tell immediately. The terminology was slightly wrong. The workflows assumed steps that no real dispatcher would take. The ELD and TMS were always separate systems that "integrated" — meaning they sometimes shared data, if you configured things correctly, and the configuration broke whenever either vendor pushed an update.

"The best way to evaluate trucking software is to use it under real pressure. Not in a demo. Not in a test environment. On a real load, with a real deadline, when a broker is calling every 30 minutes for an update."

The specific things that were broken

Without naming specific vendors: one major TMS required five screen transitions to update a load status. Not five clicks — five full page navigations. On a mobile browser from a truck stop, that meant 45 seconds to tell a broker the truck was loaded. Another system had beautiful analytics dashboards but couldn't tell you, in real time, how many hours of drive time your driver had remaining without navigating to a separate compliance module.

The ELD market was worse. Most ELD systems were designed to satisfy FMCSA's technical requirements — which they did — while making the user experience as painful as possible. Drivers hated them. When drivers hate their tools, they find workarounds. Workarounds create compliance risk.

The moment we decided to build

The decision was made on a Tuesday afternoon when our dispatcher spent 40 minutes re-entering data from a rate confirmation PDF that our ELD had already captured in a different system. The information existed. It was digital. It lived in three different places that didn't talk to each other, and a human was manually transferring it between systems.

That's not a technology problem. That's a lack of ambition problem. Nobody had decided to solve it because the existing systems were profitable enough without solving it.

What we decided to build instead

One platform. ELD and TMS as the same system, not integrations. AI that reads rate confirmation PDFs so dispatchers don't have to. A dispatcher — eventually an AI dispatcher — that covers nights and weekends so loads don't get missed. E-sign built in, not bolted on.

And priced at zero through 2026, because the goal was to prove the product worked before asking carriers to pay for it.

Two years in: did it work?

The Rate Con AI has a 95%+ accuracy rate on standard broker formats. ERETH ELD passed FMCSA's technical certification. Our AI dispatchers book real loads for real carriers after hours. The carrier dashboard still occasionally has a minor bug — we fix them the same day they're reported.

Would we have been better off just using an existing system and focusing on freight? Financially, in the short term, probably yes. But we would have kept paying $400 per truck per month for software that we knew was mediocre. And we would have missed the opportunity to build something that actually works the way the industry needs it to work.

We don't regret it.

← Back to Blog Next: Our first AI broker call →