← Back to Blog
Trucking News

Trucking News: September 14, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

Trucking News: September 14, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

Monday’s trucking news puts attention on five areas that directly affect smaller fleets: enforcement messaging, driver appreciation, career development, automated vehicle policy, and CDL training oversight. None of these stories is just background noise. Each can influence recruiting, compliance decisions, equipment planning, or the way a carrier communicates with drivers and customers.

Homeland Security post targeting “Mr. Singh” draws backlash

A Homeland Security social media post aimed at “Mr. Singh” has drawn criticism from California officials and a trucking industry leader. The backlash centers on concerns that the message unfairly singles out a name and, by extension, a community that is heavily represented in trucking. California officials have objected to the tone and implications of the post, while a trucking voice warned that broad or inflammatory messaging can damage trust with professional drivers.

For small carriers, this is more than a public-relations dispute. Many fleets depend on immigrant drivers, family networks, and multilingual recruiting channels. A government message that is perceived as stereotyping can make recruiting harder and discourage drivers from asking questions about documentation, licensing, or enforcement. Owners should keep workplace discussions focused on verifiable requirements rather than political reactions, and should direct employees to official guidance when immigration or credential questions arise.

For carriers, the practical lesson is simple: trust is an operating asset. Clear, respectful communication helps drivers report problems and stay engaged with compliance obligations.

Review your onboarding materials and driver communications for accuracy and professionalism. VAU0’s compliance resources can also help carriers organize required records and make regulatory information easier to find without relying on social media commentary.

Trucking groups prepare for National Truck Driver Appreciation Week

Trucking companies and industry organizations are preparing for National Truck Driver Appreciation Week, putting the spotlight on the people who move freight every day. Typical efforts include driver meals, recognition events, bonuses, branded messages, and stories highlighting the work behind essential deliveries.

The strongest programs go beyond a single gift or social media post. Drivers notice whether appreciation is reflected in practical decisions: realistic appointment scheduling, fast maintenance support, clean equipment, fair detention handling, and responsive dispatch. For an owner-operator, a personal call from the customer or carrier can matter as much as a larger gesture. For a small fleet, even a modest program can work if it is specific and consistent.

Carriers should also use the week to listen. Ask drivers what creates unnecessary stress, where communication breaks down, and which tools would make the job easier. A short survey or one-on-one conversation can reveal problems involving routes, paperwork, parking, or payroll. Those answers are more valuable than a generic appreciation graphic because they can lead to retention improvements after the awareness week ends.

Transition Trucking names 2026 Elite 11 honorees

TheTrucker’s profile of Monica Brooks-Buck, one of the Transition Trucking 2026 Elite 11 honorees, highlights how experience can be used to create new opportunities. Her story reflects a broader theme in the industry: drivers bring valuable skills from previous careers, military service, public service, and other forms of work, then apply that experience to transportation.

That matters to small carriers competing for qualified people. Recruiting advertisements that focus only on years of driving experience can miss candidates with strong safety habits, leadership skills, mechanical knowledge, or customer-service backgrounds. A structured orientation can help convert those abilities into reliable performance on the road. Pairing new drivers with an experienced mentor is often more effective than handing them a policy packet and sending them out alone.

Recognition programs such as Elite 11 also give fleets useful recruiting material. Share real examples of drivers who advanced, solved difficult problems, or helped train others. Candidates want to know whether a carrier offers a future, not just a seat in a truck. Building that story can help an independent fleet compete with larger employers without matching every benefit dollar-for-dollar.

DOT automated vehicle strategy points toward a gradual transition

Heavy Duty Trucking examined what the Department of Transportation’s automated vehicle strategy could mean for trucking. The strategy is important because federal policy can shape how automated driving systems are tested, evaluated, and eventually deployed. It may also affect standards, data collection, safety oversight, and the relationship between federal agencies and state regulators.

For most small carriers, automated trucks are not an immediate replacement decision. The near-term issue is watching how the policy develops and understanding where automation may enter the operation first. Highway corridors, yard movements, hub-to-hub freight, and driver-assistance systems are more likely to influence fleet planning before fully driverless operations become common across all routes.

Carriers should avoid both extremes: assuming automation is arriving next quarter, or ignoring it completely. When buying or leasing equipment, ask what driver-assistance features are included, how they are serviced, and what training is required. Keep an eye on insurance, maintenance, cybersecurity, and customer requirements as well as the technology itself. A reliable transportation management system will remain useful because dispatch, documentation, exception handling, and customer communication do not disappear when equipment changes.

FMCSA emergency CDL school closures raise licensing questions

Overdrive has published a list of commercial driver license schools affected by FMCSA’s emergency closure actions. The development underscores that a driver’s training history and the school’s authorization status can become a carrier concern, especially when a driver recently completed training or is in the process of obtaining a CDL.

Small carriers should not assume that a candidate’s certificate alone settles the issue. Before putting a new driver behind the wheel, verify the license, endorsements, medical qualification, employment history, and required training records through the normal official channels. If a school appears on the closure list, ask the driver and the relevant licensing authority what happens to records or credentials already issued. Do not make a rushed assumption that every graduate is disqualified, but do not ignore the notice either.

This is also a reminder to keep a defensible qualification file. Save copies of training documentation, hiring checks, road-test records, and communications about any unresolved question. Carriers can review their process through VAU0’s compliance page and should involve qualified regulatory counsel when a licensing decision is unclear. A short delay in onboarding is cheaper than a preventable roadside or audit problem.

What carriers should do this week

  • Review driver communications and recruiting materials for respectful, accurate language about licensing, documentation, and enforcement.
  • Plan a practical National Truck Driver Appreciation Week activity, then ask drivers for feedback on scheduling, maintenance, detention, and dispatch.
  • Check recent CDL graduates and new hires against current licensing and training records, especially if a listed school is involved.
  • Track DOT automated vehicle developments, but evaluate equipment purchases based on current safety, maintenance, and total-cost needs.
  • Audit qualification files and centralize compliance documents so dispatch and management can find the right record quickly.
← Back to Blog For Carriers →
Why We Built ESSE Instead of Buying Another TMS | ESSE Blog
Our Story

Why we built ESSE instead of buying another TMS

In 2022, we were running a small fleet and spending approximately $400 per truck per month on software. TMS license, ELD subscription, e-sign service, separate accounting integration. Four different logins. Four different monthly invoices. Four different support teams to call when something didn't work.

None of it talked to each other without manual data entry.

The software evaluation that changed everything

We spent three months evaluating every major TMS and fleet management system on the market. AscendTMS, McLeod, Motive, EZLogz, KeepTruckin, TruckingOffice, Axon. We signed up for demos, trials, and in two cases, paid for actual subscriptions to test them properly.

What we found was consistent across almost all of them: the software was built by people who had never dispatched a truck. You could tell immediately. The terminology was slightly wrong. The workflows assumed steps that no real dispatcher would take. The ELD and TMS were always separate systems that "integrated" — meaning they sometimes shared data, if you configured things correctly, and the configuration broke whenever either vendor pushed an update.

"The best way to evaluate trucking software is to use it under real pressure. Not in a demo. Not in a test environment. On a real load, with a real deadline, when a broker is calling every 30 minutes for an update."

The specific things that were broken

Without naming specific vendors: one major TMS required five screen transitions to update a load status. Not five clicks — five full page navigations. On a mobile browser from a truck stop, that meant 45 seconds to tell a broker the truck was loaded. Another system had beautiful analytics dashboards but couldn't tell you, in real time, how many hours of drive time your driver had remaining without navigating to a separate compliance module.

The ELD market was worse. Most ELD systems were designed to satisfy FMCSA's technical requirements — which they did — while making the user experience as painful as possible. Drivers hated them. When drivers hate their tools, they find workarounds. Workarounds create compliance risk.

The moment we decided to build

The decision was made on a Tuesday afternoon when our dispatcher spent 40 minutes re-entering data from a rate confirmation PDF that our ELD had already captured in a different system. The information existed. It was digital. It lived in three different places that didn't talk to each other, and a human was manually transferring it between systems.

That's not a technology problem. That's a lack of ambition problem. Nobody had decided to solve it because the existing systems were profitable enough without solving it.

What we decided to build instead

One platform. ELD and TMS as the same system, not integrations. AI that reads rate confirmation PDFs so dispatchers don't have to. A dispatcher — eventually an AI dispatcher — that covers nights and weekends so loads don't get missed. E-sign built in, not bolted on.

And priced at zero through 2026, because the goal was to prove the product worked before asking carriers to pay for it.

Two years in: did it work?

The Rate Con AI has a 95%+ accuracy rate on standard broker formats. ERETH ELD passed FMCSA's technical certification. Our AI dispatchers book real loads for real carriers after hours. The carrier dashboard still occasionally has a minor bug — we fix them the same day they're reported.

Would we have been better off just using an existing system and focusing on freight? Financially, in the short term, probably yes. But we would have kept paying $400 per truck per month for software that we knew was mediocre. And we would have missed the opportunity to build something that actually works the way the industry needs it to work.

We don't regret it.

← Back to Blog Next: Our first AI broker call →