← Back to Blog
Trucking News

Trucking News: September 17, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

Trucking Industry Reacts to Proposed Trucker Appreciation Week

Congressional legislation aimed at creating a formal Trucker Appreciation Week is drawing support across the industry. The proposal recognizes the drivers, mechanics, dispatchers, warehouse workers, and small-business owners who keep freight moving every day. While a recognition week will not solve the industry’s financial problems, it gives trucking a stronger public platform at a time when recruiting and retention remain difficult.

For small carriers, the practical value will depend on how the industry uses the attention. Appreciation campaigns can help owners recognize employees, explain trucking’s role to customers, and improve recruiting materials. They should not, however, be treated as a substitute for better pay practices, safer working conditions, predictable home time, and clear communication.

Owner-operators can use the week as a marketing opportunity by highlighting customer service, safety records, and the work required to deliver essential goods. Carriers may also want to prepare a short driver-recognition plan rather than waiting until the legislation becomes final. A simple safety bonus, public employee recognition, or customer thank-you can have more impact than a generic social media post.

Diesel Prices Are Rising, but the Full Impact May Still Be Ahead

A local trucking business owner told KVOE that record-high diesel prices have not yet worked their way fully through trucking companies or their customers. That lag is common. Many carriers operate under existing contracts, fuel-surcharge formulas, or customer pricing agreements that adjust after a delay. Some fleets may also be using fuel purchased earlier at lower prices.

The pressure eventually reaches the carrier’s income statement. Fuel is one of the largest variable expenses, and a small change in price can materially affect a truck running thousands of miles each month. The impact is especially sharp for smaller fleets that lack purchasing leverage, have older equipment, or haul loads where the fuel surcharge does not accurately reflect actual consumption.

Carriers should review whether their surcharge schedules match current fuel costs and whether they apply to every customer and lane. Owner-operators should calculate fuel cost per mile by truck, not rely only on a weekly fuel total. VAU0’s operational tools can help carriers organize load, mileage, and expense information through the /tms.html resources, making it easier to identify unprofitable freight before accepting it.

Higher diesel prices do not become a problem only when the tank bill arrives. The real risk is the delay between rising costs and updated customer rates, when a carrier may be hauling at yesterday’s margin.

Afognak Acquires Weaver Bros. Trucking Companies

Afognak’s acquisition of the Weaver Bros. family of trucking companies is another reminder that consolidation continues across specialized and regional freight markets. Family-owned carriers often bring strong local relationships, experienced employees, and knowledge of difficult operating environments. An acquisition can provide access to capital, technology, equipment, and broader business opportunities.

For customers and employees, the transition will be closely watched. The success of a trucking acquisition depends on whether the buyer preserves the operational knowledge that made the acquired company valuable. Changes to dispatching, maintenance, payroll, insurance, or customer service can create disruption if they are implemented too quickly.

Small carriers should view this transaction as both a market signal and a planning prompt. Owners considering growth should know the value of clean financial records, documented maintenance, consistent safety procedures, and transferable customer relationships. Owners who are not looking to sell should still have a continuity plan covering key personnel, equipment, permits, and customer communication.

Non-Domiciled CDL Rule Faces Court Challenges

FMCSA’s restrictions involving non-domiciled commercial driver’s licenses are facing significant challenges in court, according to Overdrive. The dispute creates uncertainty for drivers, carriers, state licensing agencies, and enforcement personnel. Until the legal process produces a final outcome, businesses should avoid assuming that a court challenge automatically cancels the rule or that every part of the policy will remain unchanged.

Carriers employing affected drivers should monitor official FMCSA and state motor-vehicle-agency guidance rather than relying on social media summaries. A driver’s license status, eligibility documents, expiration dates, and state requirements should be reviewed carefully. Dispatching a driver without confirming current qualification can expose a small carrier to roadside delays, violations, insurance complications, and customer claims.

This is a good time to tighten qualification-file procedures. Keep copies of required documents, track expiration dates, and record who reviewed each file and when. VAU0’s compliance information at /compliance.html can serve as a starting point for organizing recurring reviews, but carriers should verify legal requirements with the appropriate government agency and qualified counsel when a driver’s status is unclear.

FMCSA Signals a Busy 2026 Rulemaking Schedule

FMCSA is signaling a substantial group of rules and regulatory actions for 2026. The announcements cover issues that could affect equipment, driver qualification, safety systems, enforcement, and daily paperwork. Rulemaking often moves slowly, but carriers should pay attention early because proposed rules can require operational changes long before a final compliance deadline.

For small fleets, the challenge is not just understanding each rule. It is finding time to evaluate costs, submit comments when appropriate, update policies, train drivers, and adjust customer pricing. A new requirement that appears minor on paper can create expenses for software, inspections, recordkeeping, equipment, or legal review.

Carriers should assign one person to monitor regulatory developments and maintain a simple calendar of proposed rules, comment deadlines, effective dates, and required actions. Do not wait for a roadside inspection or customer questionnaire to reveal that a policy is outdated. Building a repeatable process now can make future changes less disruptive.

What carriers should do this week

  • Recalculate fuel cost per mile and compare current fuel-surcharge revenue with actual expenses on major lanes.
  • Review driver qualification files, CDL status, medical certificates, and expiration dates, especially for drivers affected by changing licensing rules.
  • Check official FMCSA and state-agency updates weekly, and document any compliance decisions made from those updates.
  • Prepare a practical Trucker Appreciation Week plan that recognizes drivers and support staff without replacing meaningful pay and safety improvements.
  • Update continuity and acquisition-readiness records, including equipment lists, maintenance files, customer contracts, insurance documents, and financial reports.
← Back to Blog For Carriers →
Why We Built ESSE Instead of Buying Another TMS | ESSE Blog
Our Story

Why we built ESSE instead of buying another TMS

In 2022, we were running a small fleet and spending approximately $400 per truck per month on software. TMS license, ELD subscription, e-sign service, separate accounting integration. Four different logins. Four different monthly invoices. Four different support teams to call when something didn't work.

None of it talked to each other without manual data entry.

The software evaluation that changed everything

We spent three months evaluating every major TMS and fleet management system on the market. AscendTMS, McLeod, Motive, EZLogz, KeepTruckin, TruckingOffice, Axon. We signed up for demos, trials, and in two cases, paid for actual subscriptions to test them properly.

What we found was consistent across almost all of them: the software was built by people who had never dispatched a truck. You could tell immediately. The terminology was slightly wrong. The workflows assumed steps that no real dispatcher would take. The ELD and TMS were always separate systems that "integrated" — meaning they sometimes shared data, if you configured things correctly, and the configuration broke whenever either vendor pushed an update.

"The best way to evaluate trucking software is to use it under real pressure. Not in a demo. Not in a test environment. On a real load, with a real deadline, when a broker is calling every 30 minutes for an update."

The specific things that were broken

Without naming specific vendors: one major TMS required five screen transitions to update a load status. Not five clicks — five full page navigations. On a mobile browser from a truck stop, that meant 45 seconds to tell a broker the truck was loaded. Another system had beautiful analytics dashboards but couldn't tell you, in real time, how many hours of drive time your driver had remaining without navigating to a separate compliance module.

The ELD market was worse. Most ELD systems were designed to satisfy FMCSA's technical requirements — which they did — while making the user experience as painful as possible. Drivers hated them. When drivers hate their tools, they find workarounds. Workarounds create compliance risk.

The moment we decided to build

The decision was made on a Tuesday afternoon when our dispatcher spent 40 minutes re-entering data from a rate confirmation PDF that our ELD had already captured in a different system. The information existed. It was digital. It lived in three different places that didn't talk to each other, and a human was manually transferring it between systems.

That's not a technology problem. That's a lack of ambition problem. Nobody had decided to solve it because the existing systems were profitable enough without solving it.

What we decided to build instead

One platform. ELD and TMS as the same system, not integrations. AI that reads rate confirmation PDFs so dispatchers don't have to. A dispatcher — eventually an AI dispatcher — that covers nights and weekends so loads don't get missed. E-sign built in, not bolted on.

And priced at zero through 2026, because the goal was to prove the product worked before asking carriers to pay for it.

Two years in: did it work?

The Rate Con AI has a 95%+ accuracy rate on standard broker formats. ERETH ELD passed FMCSA's technical certification. Our AI dispatchers book real loads for real carriers after hours. The carrier dashboard still occasionally has a minor bug — we fix them the same day they're reported.

Would we have been better off just using an existing system and focusing on freight? Financially, in the short term, probably yes. But we would have kept paying $400 per truck per month for software that we knew was mediocre. And we would have missed the opportunity to build something that actually works the way the industry needs it to work.

We don't regret it.

← Back to Blog Next: Our first AI broker call →