← Back to Blog
Trucking News

Trucking News: September 20, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

Trucking News: September 20, 2026 — What Carriers Need to Know

September 20, 2026 — Trucking enters the week with pressure coming from several directions: fuel costs are rising, federal regulators are preparing a busy rulemaking schedule, and courts are examining major changes to commercial licensing. Congress is also considering a trucker appreciation week, giving the industry a welcome moment of recognition even as operating costs remain difficult.

Congressional Push for Trucker Appreciation Week Gets Industry Reaction

Legislation introduced by Congresswoman Harriet Hageman would establish a formal week recognizing professional truck drivers and the role they play in keeping stores, factories, farms, and construction sites supplied. Industry reaction has been generally positive because drivers rarely receive public recognition for the long hours, missed family events, and demanding conditions that come with the job.

For small carriers, the proposal is mainly symbolic, but symbolism still has practical value. Recruiting and retention are easier when drivers feel respected by customers, the public, and policymakers. Carriers can use the week as an opportunity to recognize employees, share driver stories, and reinforce safe driving habits. It is not a substitute for better detention practices, fair compensation, or safer parking, but public awareness can help keep those issues in the conversation.

High Diesel Prices Continue to Squeeze Trucking Margins

Trucking groups are warning that there is no immediate relief in sight for elevated diesel prices. A separate report from Transport Topics describes the latest increase as a shock to the industry, and that pressure reaches every segment of the market. Fuel is one of the few major costs that can change sharply in a matter of days, leaving carriers exposed when rates do not adjust just as quickly.

Small fleets and owner-operators are especially vulnerable when they haul under contracts with weak or outdated fuel-surcharge formulas. A surcharge based on an old regional average may not cover what a truck is actually paying at the pump. Carriers should review fuel tables, compare route-specific prices, and calculate fuel cost per loaded mile rather than relying only on a weekly total. Dispatch decisions also matter: an empty repositioning move or a long deadhead can erase the profit from an otherwise acceptable load.

Fuel planning should be tied to the same operating data used for billing and dispatch. A transportation management system can help compare planned miles, fuel stops, and expected revenue before a truck commits to a load. VAU0’s TMS tools are designed to give carriers a clearer view of those decisions instead of leaving fuel leakage hidden in spreadsheets.

FMCSA Signals a Busy Rulemaking Schedule for 2026

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration is teasing a flurry of proposed and final rules for 2026. The exact impact will depend on which proposals move forward, but a crowded regulatory calendar means carriers should expect more notices, comment periods, guidance updates, and compliance changes over the coming months.

For smaller carriers, the risk is not only a major rule that changes equipment or operating procedures. Administrative changes can also create problems when a company misses a filing deadline, fails to update a policy, or does not train drivers on a revised requirement. Owners should assign someone to monitor regulatory developments and keep a documented process for reviewing new rules. Waiting until enforcement begins is usually more expensive than preparing during the proposal stage.

Carriers should also keep core records organized now: driver qualification files, inspection documentation, maintenance records, training evidence, and drug-and-alcohol compliance materials. A clean system makes it easier to respond to changes and audits. VAU0’s compliance resources can help carriers build a repeatable review process rather than treating compliance as a last-minute emergency.

Non-Domiciled CDL Restrictions Face Court Pressure

FMCSA’s restrictions involving non-domiciled commercial driver licenses are facing a serious challenge in court. The legal developments are still unfolding, so carriers should avoid assuming that the rule is permanently settled or permanently blocked. Court orders, agency guidance, and state implementation decisions can change the practical requirements quickly.

This issue matters to carriers that employ drivers with non-domiciled credentials or recruit from a broad labor pool. A driver may have a valid-looking license while still requiring additional verification under current federal and state requirements. Carriers should review affected driver files, confirm license status directly through the appropriate state process, and document the basis for each hiring or dispatch decision.

Owners should not rely on social media summaries or informal explanations of the court action. Monitor FMCSA and state motor vehicle agency updates, and ask qualified compliance counsel about any driver-specific questions. Until the situation is clearer, carriers may need contingency plans for qualification, scheduling, and replacement capacity.

What the Week’s News Means for Small Carriers

Taken together, these stories point to a difficult operating environment rather than one single crisis. Recognition legislation may improve the industry’s public profile, but it does not reduce diesel bills. Regulatory activity may improve safety and consistency, but it also increases the amount of information a carrier must track. The CDL litigation may eventually clarify the rules, but uncertainty itself creates risk for employers and drivers.

The best response is disciplined management. Know the real cost of each trip, keep qualification and compliance records current, and communicate clearly with drivers about changes that affect their licenses or daily work. Carriers that maintain accurate information will have more options when fuel prices rise, rules change, or a driver’s eligibility must be reviewed quickly.

What carriers should do this week

  • Review fuel-surcharge terms and compare them with actual fuel costs by lane and region.
  • Audit driver qualification files, including license status and documentation for non-domiciled CDL holders.
  • Set a weekly process for monitoring FMCSA rulemaking, court updates, and state implementation notices.
  • Use dispatch or TMS data to reduce deadhead miles, plan fuel stops, and measure profit per loaded mile.
  • Recognize drivers publicly and internally during trucker appreciation efforts, while also collecting feedback on pay, detention, parking, and equipment concerns.
← Back to Blog For Carriers →
Why We Built ESSE Instead of Buying Another TMS | ESSE Blog
Our Story

Why we built ESSE instead of buying another TMS

In 2022, we were running a small fleet and spending approximately $400 per truck per month on software. TMS license, ELD subscription, e-sign service, separate accounting integration. Four different logins. Four different monthly invoices. Four different support teams to call when something didn't work.

None of it talked to each other without manual data entry.

The software evaluation that changed everything

We spent three months evaluating every major TMS and fleet management system on the market. AscendTMS, McLeod, Motive, EZLogz, KeepTruckin, TruckingOffice, Axon. We signed up for demos, trials, and in two cases, paid for actual subscriptions to test them properly.

What we found was consistent across almost all of them: the software was built by people who had never dispatched a truck. You could tell immediately. The terminology was slightly wrong. The workflows assumed steps that no real dispatcher would take. The ELD and TMS were always separate systems that "integrated" — meaning they sometimes shared data, if you configured things correctly, and the configuration broke whenever either vendor pushed an update.

"The best way to evaluate trucking software is to use it under real pressure. Not in a demo. Not in a test environment. On a real load, with a real deadline, when a broker is calling every 30 minutes for an update."

The specific things that were broken

Without naming specific vendors: one major TMS required five screen transitions to update a load status. Not five clicks — five full page navigations. On a mobile browser from a truck stop, that meant 45 seconds to tell a broker the truck was loaded. Another system had beautiful analytics dashboards but couldn't tell you, in real time, how many hours of drive time your driver had remaining without navigating to a separate compliance module.

The ELD market was worse. Most ELD systems were designed to satisfy FMCSA's technical requirements — which they did — while making the user experience as painful as possible. Drivers hated them. When drivers hate their tools, they find workarounds. Workarounds create compliance risk.

The moment we decided to build

The decision was made on a Tuesday afternoon when our dispatcher spent 40 minutes re-entering data from a rate confirmation PDF that our ELD had already captured in a different system. The information existed. It was digital. It lived in three different places that didn't talk to each other, and a human was manually transferring it between systems.

That's not a technology problem. That's a lack of ambition problem. Nobody had decided to solve it because the existing systems were profitable enough without solving it.

What we decided to build instead

One platform. ELD and TMS as the same system, not integrations. AI that reads rate confirmation PDFs so dispatchers don't have to. A dispatcher — eventually an AI dispatcher — that covers nights and weekends so loads don't get missed. E-sign built in, not bolted on.

And priced at zero through 2026, because the goal was to prove the product worked before asking carriers to pay for it.

Two years in: did it work?

The Rate Con AI has a 95%+ accuracy rate on standard broker formats. ERETH ELD passed FMCSA's technical certification. Our AI dispatchers book real loads for real carriers after hours. The carrier dashboard still occasionally has a minor bug — we fix them the same day they're reported.

Would we have been better off just using an existing system and focusing on freight? Financially, in the short term, probably yes. But we would have kept paying $400 per truck per month for software that we knew was mediocre. And we would have missed the opportunity to build something that actually works the way the industry needs it to work.

We don't regret it.

← Back to Blog Next: Our first AI broker call →